On the radio this afternoon, March 11th at 4:00 PM Eastern Time to discuss the Malaysian Airliner story

Hi Gang:

This afternoon, Tuesday, March 11th, at 4:00 PM Eastern Daylight Saving Time, I will be on Armstrong Williams’ radio show “The Right Side.” 

I hope you will be listening!

Here is the link to his terrific show that airs on Radio Station WGCV:

We will be discussing the Malaysian Airlines plane that has gone missing and the questions surrounding the passengers who were onboard carrying stolen and altered passports.

You may be surprised to find out why passports from Europe are highly valued by terrorists- we will get into this issue as well as other important areas of concern.

While it is way too soon to know what fate befell the airliner and those on board, there are some important immigration issues not being addressed by the mainstream media.  No one has mentioned the  9/11 Commission Report and no one is willing to discuss the true importance of the immigration system to combatting terrorism.  

Members of the news media, echoing statements of some government officials have said that because one of the passengers who was carrying an altered, stolen passport was planning to apply for political asylum that it made it less likely that he would be involved in terrorism.  
However, on March 9, 2014 the Huffington Post published an Associated Press (AP) report: “Air Force Chief: Malaysia Jet May Have Turned Back. One of the officials who was quoted in the report was the Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Nobel.  Here is a segment of what he said:

In a forceful statement, Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble chided authorities for “waiting for a tragedy to put prudent security measures in place at borders and boarding gates.”

“Now, we have a real case where the world is speculating whether the stolen passport holders were terrorists,” Noble said. “Interpol is asking why only a handful of countries worldwide are taking care to make sure that persons possessing stolen passports are not boarding international flights.”

Clearly he understands the real importance of border security and integrity in the immigration system.

While we should not rush to judgement about any facts in this case- especially considering how sparse those facts are, it is equally wrong to make presumptions about what this passenger who purportedly planned to apply for asylum may or may not mean in regards to any links he may have had to terrorist organizations.  

The 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission staff identified political asylum as being one of the favored means for terrorists to enter a country and embed themselves in that country, enabling them to hide in plain sight.  I have, in fact, attached an important excerpt from the 9/11 Commission Report to the bottom of this e-mail that you must take the time to read.  I also ask that you provide that excerpt to your friends and neighbors and especially to your elected representatives on the federal, state and even local government and ask them how they can ignore the information contained in that excerpt when they vote refuse to enforce the immigration laws that are America’s first line of defense and last line of defense against international terrorists and transnational criminal organizations.

In January 1993 a Pakistani citizen by the name of Mir Kansi stood outside CIA Headquarters in Virginia and opened fire with an AK-47, killing two CIA officers and wounding three others.  He had applied for political asylum.  One month later, Ramsi Youssef, another recipient of political asylum in the United States helped plant a bomb in the garage of the World Trade Center that killed six innocent victims and wounded over one thousand people and inflicted a half billion dollars in damage to that once iconic centerpiece of the New York City skyline.

This past April 15 the Tsarnaev brothers, who had received political asylum along with other family members, launched a fatal bomb attack on the Boston Marathon.

The House Judiciary Committee recently conducted two hearings to consider the lack of integrity to the process by which applications for political asylum are adjudicated.

On February 11, 2014 a hearing was conducted on the issue: “Asylum Fraud: Abusing America’s Compassion?”

On December 12, 2013 a hearing was conducted on the issue: “Asylum Abuse: Is it Overwhelming our Borders?”

Both hearings made it clear that there is a serious lack of integrity to the political asylum program. This important humanitarian program programs thousands of applications each year yet the fraud rate in this program bars witness to the lack of integrity. Because USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) cannot effectively identify fraud and take measures to counter this fraud, national security is compromised.

When the NTSB responds to a plane crash they do so to determine what went wrong to make certain that the cause for the crash is fully determined and understood to prevent future such crashes and tragedies.  This was the purpose, ostensibly to the creation of the 9/11 Commission.  As you read the excerpt ask yourself how seriously these findings and recommendations are being considered and acted upon 12 years after 9/11.  To put this in perspective- consider that it took the United States just 44 months to respond to the attack at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 2941.  Today we are 144 months from the attacks of 9/11.  Furthermore, in 1993 the United States was attacked on two separate occasions by aliens from the Middle East who had gamed the visa process and immigration benefits program.  These attacks occurred nearly 21 years ago and the fundamental flaws in the immigration system that enabled those terrorists to enter the United States and embed themselves in the United States as they went about their preparation to attack us have still not been effectively addressed!
Our immigration laws were enacted to achieve two primary goals, protect innocent lives and the jobs of American workers.  Any program that undermines the effective enforcement and administration of our immigration laws undermines these two critical goals.

Immigration is not a single issue but a singular issue that impacts nearly every challenge and threat confronting the United States today!  

It is not “Anti-Immigrant” to be Pro-American!

Our armed forces are charged with securing America’s borders externally while the DHS is supposed to secure those same borders from within.  The failures of the DHS to live up to its half of the equation are undermining the efforts, valor and incredible sacrifices of Americas men and women who serve in our military!

If our government’s failures to protect American jobs by securing our nation’s borders and effectively enforcing our immigration laws concerns you or especially if it angers you, I ask you to call your Senators and Congressional “Representative. This is not only your right- it is your obligation! 

All I ask is that you make it clear to our politicians that we are not as dumb as they hope we are!

We live in a perilous world and in a perilous era. The survival of our nation and the lives of our citizens hang in the balance.

This is neither a Conservative issue, nor is it a Liberal issue- simply stated, this is most certainly an AMERICAN issue!

You are either part of the solution or you are a part of the problem!

Democracy is not a spectator sport!

Lead, follow or get out of the way!

-michael cutler- 

Please check out my website:



On Friday evenings from 7:00 PM until 8:00 PM Eastern Time, I host my show, “The Michael Cutler Hour” on the USA Talk Radio Network on Blog Talk Radio.

Call in and join the conversation!  The phone number is 310-982-4145
I hope you will be listening!  (Please tell your friends and neighbors!)

Here is a link to the program:


 Archived shows here:

  USA Talk Radio

Excerpt from the   9/11 Commission Report: 

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), with its 9,000 Border

Patrol agents, 4,500 inspectors, and 2,000 immigration special agents, had per-

haps the greatest potential to develop an expanded role in counterterrorism.

However, the INS was focused on the formidable challenges posed by illegal

entry over the southwest border, criminal aliens, and a growing backlog in the

applications for naturalizing immigrants.The White House, the Justice Department,

and above all the Congress reinforced these concerns. In addition, when

Doris Meissner became INS Commissioner in 1993, she found an agency seri-

ously hampered by outdated technology and insufficient human resources. Bor-

der Patrol agents were still using manual typewriters; inspectors at ports of entry

were using a paper watchlist; the asylum and other benefits systems did not

effectively deter fraudulent applicants.


Commissioner Meissner responded in 1993 to the World Trade Center

bombing by providing seed money to the State Department’s Consular Affairs

Bureau to automate its terrorist watchlist, used by consular officers and border

inspectors. The INS assigned an individual in a new “lookout” unit to work

with the State Department in watchlisting suspected terrorists and with the

intelligence community and the FBI in determining how to deal with them

when they appeared at ports of entry. By 1998, 97 suspected terrorists had been

denied admission at U.S. ports of entry because of the watchlist.


How to conduct deportation cases against aliens who were suspected terrorists

caused significant debate.The INS had immigration law expertise and

authority to bring the cases, but the FBI possessed the classified information

sometimes needed as evidence, and information-sharing conflicts resulted.

New laws in 1996 authorized the use of classified evidence in removal hear-

ings, but the INS removed only a handful of the aliens with links to terrorist

activity (none identified as associated with al Qaeda) using classified evidence.


Midlevel INS employees proposed comprehensive counterterrorism pro-

posals to management in 1986, 1995, and 1997. No action was taken on them.

In 1997, a National Security Unit was set up to handle alerts, track potential

terrorist cases for possible immigration enforcement action, and work with the

rest of the Justice Department. It focused on the FBI’s priorities of Hezbollah

and Hamas, and began to examine how immigration laws could be brought to

bear on terrorism. For instance, it sought unsuccessfully to require that CIA

security checks be completed before naturalization applications were



Policy questions, such as whether resident alien status should be

revoked upon the person’s conviction of a terrorist crime, were not addressed.

Congress, with the support of the Clinton administration, doubled the num-

ber of Border Patrol agents required along the border with Mexico to one

agent every quarter mile by 1999. It rejected efforts to bring additional

resources to bear in the north.The border with Canada had one agent for every

13.25 miles. Despite examples of terrorists entering from Canada, awareness of

terrorist activity in Canada and its more lenient immigration laws, and an

inspector general’s report recommending that the Border Patrol develop a

northern border strategy, the only positive step was that the number of Border

Patrol agents was not cut any further.


Inspectors at the ports of entry were not asked to focus on terrorists. Inspec-

tors told us they were not even aware that when they checked the names of

incoming passengers against the automated watchlist, they were checking in

part for terrorists. In general, border inspectors also did not have the informa-

tion they needed to make fact-based determinations of admissibility.The INS

initiated but failed to bring to completion two efforts that would have pro-

vided inspectors with information relevant to counterterrorism—a proposed

system to track foreign student visa compliance and a program to establish a way

of tracking travelers’ entry to and exit from the United States.


In 1996, a new law enabled the INS to enter into agreements with state and

local law enforcement agencies through which the INS provided training and

the local agencies exercised immigration enforcement authority. Terrorist

watchlists were not available to them. Mayors in cities with large immigrant

populations sometimes imposed limits on city employee cooperation with fed-

eral immigration agents.A large population lives outside the legal framework.

Fraudulent documents could be easily obtained. Congress kept the number of

INS agents static in the face of the overwhelming problem.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *