"Napolitano subpoenaed for illegals data" (At issue is the administration’s policy of "Prosecutorial Discretion)

Hi Gang:
The administration has taken to the unprecedented tactic of providing huge numbers of illegal aliens with a de facto amnesty through the issue of policy directives to the employees of DHS that not only terminated deportation (removal) proceedings against illegal aliens but even providing hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens with employment authorization.
My commentary today is predicated upon a Washington Times article that reports on how the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement, chaired by Lamar Smith, has subpoenaed the records relating to the aliens who have benefited by the administration’s policies concerning what it refers to as “Prosecutorial Discretion.”
The actions by the subcommittee are significant and consistent with the exercise of oversight as mandated in the Constitution.  It is about accountability!  In a manner of speaking, the subpoena served upon the administration for these records is the equivalent of Internal Affairs asking to see the log of a police officer to determine if he (she) carried out his duties faithfully and in accordance with accepted practices and policies.  Here, of course, the administration is certainly entitled to establish policies but the issue of motivation and intentions are of extreme importance and relevance.
Where the subpoena of all of these records are concerned, however, I would caution Chairman Smith, be careful what you wish for!
Presuming that his subpoena is adhered to, his office and the offices of his staff are about to encounter a blizzard or documents relating to God knows how many hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens!
The use of “Prosecutorial Discretion” can be reasonable and appropriate when the goal is to prioritize the use of limited resources and provides for fair and effective law enforcement. 
We have all seen such discretion in action when a police officer who is monitoring motor vehicle traffic does not stop motorists who may be exceeding the speed limit by a few miles per hour but are otherwise driving prudently and safely.  In New York City, for example, the NYPD will generally ignore motorists who don’t exceed 60 mph on roads designated as having a 50 mph speed limit provided that the motorists are not driving aggressively.  This makes sense.  However, when too much leeway is given, or when laws are not enforced, drivers become lax in their driving and public safety becomes endangered.
However, there is a world of difference between a police officer who stops a speeding motorist and only issues a warning or a stern lecture about safety, because although the driver had exceeded the speed limit, he was not endangering public safety, and was otherwise driving prudently and a police officer who fails to issue a summons because of a bribe. As is the case where many aspects of law are concerned, motivation and intentions must be taken into account when determining whether wrong-doing is involved.
The problem with the administration’s broad use of prosecutorial discretion is two-fold.  First is the issue of the motivation behind this decision where political benefits may result for the administration.  If, through these policies the administration garners campaign contributions and the promise of votes in exchange for the non-enforcement of the immigration laws then I believe an important line has been crossed.  If this is the motivation then prosecutorial discretion would not really be about creating a “triage” wherein the most serious offenders are prioritized to maximize the use of the far too limited resources that ICE and CBP has at its disposal.
I would argue that if the administration has concocted its policy of nonfeasance, where the immigration laws are concerned, under the guise of “prosecutorial discretion” to achieve a political objective, for example, seeking to curry favor with deep-pocketed campaign contributors or the promise of votes from members of advocacy organizations, it is walking a fine line and may actually be guilty of misfeasance and/or malfeasance!
To provide a bit of clarity, according to the Online Merriam-Webster Dictionary, here are the definitions of nonfeasance, misfeasance and malfeasance:

non·fea·sance

noun ?nän-?f?-z?n(t)s

Definition of NONFEASANCE

: failure to act; especially : failure to do what ought to be done 

mis·fea·sance

noun mis-?f?-z?n(t)s

Definition of MISFEASANCE

: trespass; specifically : the performance of a lawful action in an illegal or improper manner

mal·fea·sance

noun ?mal-?f?-z?n(t)s

Definition of MALFEASANCE

: wrongdoing or misconduct especially by a public official

If the administration really wants to enforce the immigration laws but cannot do the sort of job it really would want to do, why then has Janet Napolitano, the Secretary of DHS which overseas CBP and ICE not asked for additional funding to hire more enforcement personnel for ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and CBP (Customs and Border Protection)?  
It is astonishing that TSA (Transportation Safety Administration) has more than 60.000 employees to screen airline passengers but only about 7,000 enforcement personnel at ICE and more than half of those 7,000 are engaged in enforcing customs laws and not the immigration laws!
Now we need to consider the second problem that may well result from the current use of prosecutorial discretion and this has to do with the simple fact concerning the significance of our nation’s immigration laws, especially in this perilous era which cannot be overstated.
Title 8, United States Code section 212 is that section of law that enumerates the various categories of aliens who, under the INA, are supposed to be prevented from entering the United States and are supposed to be removed if they are found here:

Here is a link to that section of law:

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-1956.html

Please take the time to review the contents of this section of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Among the categories of aliens who are supposed to be kept out of the United States are aliens with dangerous communicable diseases, aliens who suffer serious mental illness and are prone to violence, aliens who are convicted felons, aliens who fugitives from justice in other countries, aliens who are human traffickers and drug smugglers, aliens who are war criminals and aliens who have committed human rights violations.  Also aliens who are engaged in terrorism and espionage are among those who are, by law, supposed to be prevented from entering our country and are supposed to be removed if they manage to evade the Border Patrol and enter the United States.

Illegal aliens who run our nation’s borders may simply be intent on seeking unlawful employment or may have more sinister goals in mind.  The problem with aliens who evade the inspections process, as I have noted on many previous occasions, is that there is no record of their entry into our country and their is often no way of properly identifying these illegal aliens when they are encountered.  While the open borders advocates have adopted the practice begun by the Carter administration of referring to illegal aliens as being “undocumented” to minimize the significance of their presence in our country and blur the distinction between aliens who are lawfully present or whose presence represents a violation of our nation’s borders and laws, the term “Undocumented” is one that we should take a moment to contemplate.  
When an alien is described as being “undocumented” what is really being conceded is that the is foreign national in question is one whose true identity and even his (her) nationality is unknown and likely, unknowable.  This means that there is no reliable way of determining this individual’s criminal history, especially in foreign countries.  There is no way of truly knowing if this individual is desperate for a job or desperate to evade law enforcement authorities in another country or, perhaps, even in multiple countries, for committing heinous crimes.  There is no way of reliably determining if that person his affiliated with criminal or terrorist organizations and there is certainly no reliable way of knowing why that person is in the United States.
An undocumented alien who is present in our country presents a threat to the wellbeing and the security of our nation and our citizens because of all of those unknowns I laid out above!
Even if the illegal alien is simply attempting to secure a job, you must consider how difficult it now is for Americans to secure a job in this extremely challenging economic climate!

Recently ABC News posted a very upsetting news report about how pervasive hunger is today, here in America, among American children. This important piece of journalism was entitled:

“Shocking Need: American Kids Go Hungry”

Here is a link to the video of this heart-breaking report that every American must see:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/hunger-home-american-children-malnourished/story?id=14367230&nwltr=WN_topstory_hed

In addition to providing you with the Washington Times article that prompted my commentary today, below, I have also provided you with a disturbing news report that appears in the Huffington Post about how many of our fellow citizens have exhausted their unemployment benefits and have no means of supporting themselves and their families.  
The title of this disturbing news report is:
“Unemployment Benefits: Most Of The Unemployed No Longer Receive Benefits”

Here is a link to that news report:

While the administration keeps hawing its “Jobs Bills” it is doing nothing to staunch the flow of foreign workers who compete with American workers for those precious jobs!
In my judgement, based on my 30 years with the former INS, the appropriate way of truly utilizing “prosecutorial discretion” is to conduct investigations that focus on the identification of violators of the immigration laws that clearly pose a threat to the safety and wellbeing of our citizens and our nation but to also make certain that when illegal aliens are encountered in the United States that they be taken into custody and that their removal (deportation) should be sought.  This would send a clear message to illegal aliens who are present in our country that they face the risk of discovery, arrest and deportation if they are in the proverbial “wrong place at the wrong time.”  
This would also send a clear message to people in other countries who may be contemplating coming to the United States by running our borders or otherwise violating our laws that even if they manage to evade the Border Patrol and survive the trek across some truly dangerous terrain or game the visa process or the insane Visa Waiver Program, that they may well find that they may be discovered, arrested and deported.
This is what deterrence is all about.   
The outrageously broad use of prosecutorial discretion which not only calls for DHS officials to not seek to arrest and deport illegal aliens but actually rewards illegal aliens with employment authorization would certainly appear to be a violation of our nation’s federal immigration laws- the same laws that the administration has shown utter contempt for!
By ordering that DHS personnel not arrest illegal aliens but, in fact, provide them with employment authorization not only creates still more competition for unemployed Americans and lawful immigrants but, in my judgement, creates a powerful incentive for still more illegal aliens to ignore our nation’s borders and violate our nation’s immigration laws.  The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) the all inclusive body of laws that govern the enforcement and administration of our nation’s immigration laws, deems it a felony to  encourage, induce, aid or abet aliens to enter our country in violation of law or to remain illegally in the United States in violation of law.

Here is an excerpt from the relating statute:

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Here is the link to this section of law in its entirety.

By establishing such a policy of prosecutorial discretion, the administration, in my judgement, also exposes our nation and our citizens to a national security vulnerability.  The fact that terrorists who would seek to enter the United States to embed themselves in our country in preparation to carrying our a terrorist attack have now been notified that if they can evade the Border Patrol that if they make their way to any city in the United States they like, all that they need to do is not be arrested and convicted of committing a felony and they will have nothing to fear from ICE!
Terrorists fully understand the need to keep a low profile and thus hide in plain sight or, in the parlance of the 9/11 Commission, embed themselves in our country.  The current policy of prosecutorial discretion removes randomness from the equation where terrorists and transnational criminals are concerned!
It is time for the citizens of our nation to contact the politicians who are responsible for their failures to live up to their oaths of office and enforce our immigration laws.

The goal must be to make it clear to our nation’s leaders, on all levels, to come to terms with the fundamental fact that nation’s borders and our immigration laws exist to protect our nation and our citizens from aliens whose presence has the potential to have a serious adverse impact.  Ignoring those laws exposes our nation and our citizens to a variety of serious threats and challenges ranging from national security and criminal justice and public safety to the economy, the environment, healthcare and education!

We are often told that our nation is a nation of immigrants- what must be remembered is that the difference between an immigrant and an illegal aliens is comparable to the difference between an houseguest and burglar!
A country without secure borders can no more stand than can a house without walls!

I

our country is to survive and if our children and their children are to get their share of the “American Dream” the citizens of this nation must take their citizenship seriously!

We the People must be the best citizens we can be, citizens who are worthy of the gallantry demonstrated by our valiant men and women in the military, law enforcement and firefighters, who routinely go in harm’s way in defense of this nation and our citizens.  
My goal in writing this and other commentaries is to point out our nations many failings before more victims pay the ultimate price for the incompetence and ineptitude of our government.
The first step in problem-solving is to first identify the problems and vulnerabilities and then devise strategies to overcome them.
If you find yourself to be in agreement with this commentary, I ask that you forward it to as many of your friends and family members as possible and encourage them to do the same.  We need to create a “Bucket Brigade of Truth!”

The practice of good citizenship does not end in the voting booth, it only begins there.

For far too long our citizens demonstrated apathy which emboldened elected representatives to all but ignore the needs of the average American citizen in a quest for massive campaign funds and the promises of votes to be ostensibly delivered by special interest groups. 

It is therefore understandable that the politicians of both parties, are greatly concerned about the demonstrations currently sweeping our nation just as did the creation of the Tea Party.  Clearly  more and more of our fellow Americans are demonstrating that they are not as dumb as the politicians from both parties had expected us to be!

I am encouraged that more and more of us, We the People, are not willing to simply sit on the sidelines anymore!

I believe our nation’s is greatly benefited by the rich diversity of our people which is why I could never imagine living anywhere except New York City, arguably the most diverse city in our nation if not, in fact, the world.  However, my idea of diversity most certainly does not include members of MS-13, the Mexican drug cartels or members of other transnational gangs or members of al-Qaeda!

If our government’s failures to secure our nation’s borders and effectively enforce our immigration laws concerns you or especially if it angers you, I ask you to call your Senators and Congressional “Representative. This is not only your right- it is your obligation! 

All I ask is that you make it clear to our politicians that we are not as dumb as they hope we are!

We live in a perilous world and in a perilous era. The survival of our nation and the lives of our citizens hang in the balance.

This is neither a Conservative issue, nor is it a Liberal issue- simply stated, this is most certainly an AMERICAN issue!

You are either part of the solution or you are a part of the problem!

Democracy is not a spectator sport!

Lead, follow or get out of the way!

-michael cutler- 


Please check out my website:

       
On Friday evenings from 7:00 PM until 8:00 PM Eastern Daylight Savings Time, I my show, “The Michael Cutler Hour” on the USA Talk Radio Network on Blog Talk Radio.
I hope you will be listening!  (Please tell your friends and neighbors!)
Here is a link to the program:


The Michael Cutler Hour 
Friday7pm Eastern


 Archived shows here:
  USA Talk Radio

The call-in number for a live show is 310-982-4145

Call in via Skype for free here
(while show is Live)

Napolitano subpoenaed for illegals data
Friday, November 4, 2011

The House immigration subcommittee issued a subpoena Friday demanding
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano turn over records showing
which illegal immigrants her department has declined to pursue
deportation cases against.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar
Smith, Texas Republican, set a Nov. 10 deadline for turning over the
information, which includes the identities of any foreigners who have
been arrested and referred to Homeland Security, but whom the government
either didn’t take custody or didn’t put into removal proceedings.

A spokesman for Ms. Napolitano said they were working to turn over the information even without the subpoena.

Mr.
Smith first requested the on Aug. 22, and personally gave an Oct. 31
deadline to Ms. Napolitano last week. But the administration missed that
target. Members of the committee said the department told them some of
the information requested belongs to the FBI, which doesn’t want to
release it.

“Are administration officials afraid that the
information will show that illegal immigrants intentionally released by
ICE have committed crimes that could have been prevented?” Mr. Smith
said. “Why else would they hide the information?”

The subpoena specifically names Ms. Napolitano.

Matthew Chandler, a spokesman for Homeland Security, said they have assured the committee they will send over the information.

“During
numerous conversations over the past week, including this morning, DHS
stated to the committee it will provide the data requested with or
without a subpoena,” he said.

The immigration subcommittee voted
along party lines earlier this week to authorize Mr. Smith to send the
subpoena, with Republicans saying they wanted a way to make the
administration back up its promises of compliance.

That subpoena
was one of two that Republicans in the House authorized this week. The
other, which came out of the Energy and Commerce Committee’s
investigations subcommittee, seeks White House documents related to
Solyndra, the failed solar technology company that received special
attention from President Obama and his top staff.

Late Friday
afternoon Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton announced he had
issued that subpoena and had it served on White House Chief of Staff
William Daley and Bruce Reed, chief of staff for Vice President Joseph
R. Biden Jr. Mr. Upton also set a Nov. 10 deadline for the Solyndra
documents.

“We need to know the White House’s role in the Solyndra
debacle in order to learn the full truth about why taxpayers now find
themselves a half-billion dollars in the hole,” Mr. Upton said.

In
both cases, Democrats opposed the subpoenas, saying they were premature
and accusing Republicans of looking for a fight rather than working to
get information. They said the administration had signaled a willingness
to work to turn over the data, but said the GOP rejected those
overtures.

Republicans want the immigration data so they can see
what kinds of decisions the administration is making about who it
chooses to deport and who it decides not to pursue.

© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/05/unemployed-benefits-most-_n_1077640.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk2%7C110308

November 6, 2011

business

The Huffington Post

Unemployment Benefits: Most Of The Unemployed
No Longer Receive Benefits

Unemployment

CHRISTOPHER
S. RUGABER
  11/ 5/11 11:13 AM ET  
AP

WASHINGTON — The jobs crisis has left so many people out of work
for so long that most of America’s unemployed are no longer receiving
unemployment benefits.

Early last year, 75 percent were receiving checks. The figure is
now 48 percent – a shift that points to a growing crisis of
long-term unemployment. Nearly one-third of America’s 14 million
unemployed have had no job for a year or more.

Congress is expected to decide by year’s end whether to continue
providing emergency unemployment benefits for up to 99 weeks in the
hardest-hit states. If the emergency benefits expire, the proportion
of the unemployed receiving aid would fall further.

The ranks of the poor would also rise. The Census Bureau says
unemployment benefits kept 3.2 million people from slipping into
poverty last year. It defines poverty as annual income below $22,314
for a family of four.

Yet for a growing share of the unemployed, a vote in Congress to
extend the benefits to 99 weeks is irrelevant. They’ve had no job for
more than 99 weeks. They’re no longer eligible for benefits.

Their options include food stamps or other social programs. Nearly
46 million people received food stamps in August, a record total.
That figure could grow as more people lose unemployment benefits.

So could the government’s disability rolls. Applications for the
disability insurance program have jumped about 50 percent since 2007.

“There’s going to be increased hardship,” said Wayne
Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute.

The number of unemployed has been roughly stable this year. Yet
the number receiving benefits has plunged 30 percent.

Government unemployment benefits weren’t designed to sustain
people for long stretches without work. They usually don’t have to.
In the recoveries from the previous three recessions, the longest
average duration of unemployment was 21 weeks, in July 1983.

By contrast, in the wake of the Great Recession, the figure
reached 41 weeks in September. That’s the longest on records dating
to 1948. The figure is now 39 weeks.

“It was a good safety net for a shorter recession,” said
Carl Van Horn, an economist at Rutgers University. It assumes “the
economy will experience short interruptions and then go back to
normal.”

Weekly unemployment checks average about $300 nationwide. If the
extended benefits aren’t renewed, growth could slow by up to a
half-percentage point next year, economists say.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that each $1 spent
on unemployment benefits generates up to $1.90 in economic growth.
The CBO has found that the program is the most effective government
policy for increasing growth among 11 options it’s analyzed.

Jon Polis lives in East Greenwich, R.I., one of the 20 states
where 99 weeks of benefits are available. He used them all up after
losing his job as a warehouse worker in 2008. His benefits paid for
groceries, car maintenance and health insurance.

Now, Polis, 55, receives disability insurance payments, food
stamps and lives in government-subsidized housing. He’s been unable
to find work because employers in his field want computer skills he
doesn’t have.

“Employers are crying that they can’t find qualified help,”
he said. But the ones he interviewed with “weren’t willing to
train anybody.”

From late 2007, when the recession began, to early 2010, the
number of people receiving unemployment benefits rose more than
four-fold, to 11.5 million.

But the economy has remained so weak that an analysis of long-term
unemployment data suggests that about 2 million people have used up
99 weeks of checks and still can’t find work.

Contributing to the smaller share of the unemployed who are
receiving benefits: Some of them are college graduates or others
seeking jobs for the first time. They aren’t eligible. Only those who
have lost a job through no fault of their own qualify.

The proportion of the unemployed receiving benefits usually falls
below 50 percent during an economic recovery. Many have either quit
jobs or are new to the job market and don’t qualify.

Today, the proportion is falling for a very different reason: Jobs
remain scarce. So more of the unemployed are exhausting their
benefits.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has noted that the long-term
unemployed increasingly find it hard to find work as their skills and
professional networks erode. In a speech last month, Bernanke called
long-term unemployment a “national crisis” that should be a
top priority for Congress.

Lawmakers will have to decide whether to continue the extended
benefits by the end of this year. If the program ends, nearly 2.2
million people will be cut off by February.

Congress has extended the program nine times. But it might balk at
the $45 billion cost. It will be the first time the Republican-led
House will vote on the issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.